Feldhaus
A placeholder, grown into a project.
A fictional architecture studio that researches, plans, and builds useful spatial canvases—leaving room for clients to bring life, character, and colour.
- Status
- Self-initiated concept
- Project type
- Identity and digital experience
- Year
- 2024–2026
- Format
- Case study
Generated by Antigravity. Created and presented by DIYRO KIWIYA.
Feldhaus is a fictional portfolio project—not a client commission, a real architecture practice, or a claim that the pictured spaces were built.
The placeholder already had a world worth keeping.
Feldhaus appeared by accident while an early DIYRO KIWIYA portfolio mockup was being generated with Antigravity. A name, a set of fictional interiors, and a dark editorial architecture website arrived as temporary material—not as a planned identity.
The atmosphere was stronger than the placeholder logic around it. Instead of discarding the whole thing, the project kept the architectural restraint, tactile imagery, and project-archive rhythm, then rebuilt everything that felt generic or unearned.
An accident became an authored project in four decisions.
The work was not to invent a second Feldhaus. It was to discover what the first one was trying to become.
- 01
Keep the atmosphere
The dark image world, measured spacing, restrained materials, and archival structure already belonged together.
- 02
Define the fictional practice
Feldhaus became an architecture studio that researches, plans, and builds useful spatial frameworks rather than decorating a finished lifestyle.
- 03
Give the idea a mark
The approved mark combines an F with an open room: a useful enclosure that remains incomplete until someone inhabits it.
- 04
Refine instead of replace
The website kept its architectural character while losing the custom cursor, fake studio signals, generated textures, and performative technical language.
Feldhaus provides the canvas. The client provides the life.
The fictional studio researches how people move, plans what a space must support, and builds the useful structure that needs to endure. Colour, objects, rituals, and personality are deliberately left open to the people who inhabit it.
The mark says what Feldhaus makes.
The F is held inside an open architectural boundary. The wordmark extends the same constructed logic without turning the studio into a generic modernist template.
Polish meant removal, not replacement.
The existing website already knew how Feldhaus should feel: dark, tactile, quiet, image-led, and precise. Its full-bleed hero, horizontal project sequence, archive grid, and project drawer were retained as the project’s visual authority.
The refinement installed the approved SVG, restored the native cursor, replaced synthetic material spheres with image-backed references, removed the fictional inquiry form and false location, simplified inflated labels, and made the project’s fictional status visible without weakening the experience.
Four corrections made the website feel authored.
- 01
Use the real identity
Typed substitutes disappeared. The supplied logo now carries navigation, the hero, the footer, the case page, and the favicon.
- 02
Let interaction stay native
The generic precision cursor was removed. Clear focus states, reduced-motion support, and predictable controls now carry the interaction.
- 03
Show material through images
Generated CSS texture balls became architectural crops, so material is understood through light, scale, adjacency, and use.
- 04
Replace simulation with context
A fake contact portal became the project’s actual origin and credits. The visitor can understand the fiction, then open the standalone experience.
Imagery builds the world. Labels keep it honest.
The fictional studies are not evidence of architectural commissions. They are the visual material through which the Feldhaus identity, archive, and interface are tested.
A resolved public concept, not a simulated commission.
- 01Approved Feldhaus wordmark and room/F mark integration
- 02Fictional practice positioning and architectural-canvas proposition
- 03Responsive standalone architecture-studio website
- 04Eight-study archive with accessible detail drawer
- 05Image-backed material register
- 06Multilingual Astro portfolio case study
The artifact is real. The architecture is fictional.
The working evidence is the approved vector identity, the responsive standalone website, its selected-study slider, eight-study archive, material register, and accessible project drawer.
There is no client brief, commissioned architecture practice, verified building, commercial result, testimonial, or live inquiry service to claim. The value of the case is the transformation from generated placeholder to authored design system.
Enter the fictional practice.
The website is the project in use: the approved identity, fictional studies, material language, and refined interactions working as one architectural world.
Open the Feldhaus websiteThe disciplines shaping this result.
Liked the project?
Tell me what you are building. I will reply with an honest fit check and a practical first scope.